It occurred to me this morning as I was perusing the news that there are several questions I have for those who are willing to ignore, obfuscate, and yes, even lie to cement the power of those now in control of the worlds ONLY remaining super power.
First why are they so afraid of Glenn Beck? In most of his monologues Beck asks more questions than he answers.
He asks uncomfortable questions, questions designed to make you think, to come to your own conclusions.
He asks why no one else is asking these questions?
He asks why no one paid attention to Acorn and their activities?
He asks why no one vetted Van Jones? No one in Washington including the administration that hired him knew of his previous activities and history? Even the most naive among us should have a hard time believing that.
One day last week Beck, at his chalkboard, connected dots from radicals in the early 20th century (including Woodrow Wilson, the strong proponent of the League of Nations, the forerunner of todays UN) Che Guevera and Sol Alinsky.
He then asked the uncomfortable question, where was the main stream media? Why have there been no investigative reports on Acorn, the Apollo Alliance, the Tides Foundation, the New Black Panthers and all of their backers including George Soros, and most disturbingly Jeff Jones, co-chair of the aforementioned Apollo Alliance, former founder with Bill Ayres of the WeatherUnderground. Harry Reid senator from Nevada actually thanked the Apollo folks for their help in drafting the stimulus bill. Why is it we have senators and representatives if they aren’t writing the bills they refuse to read and then rush to sign?
Why is there a feeding frenzy around Glenn Beck? Because he is asking important questions. He connecting dots in ways the media and the liberals in government don’t want him to. Because he dares to say what many are thinking and dares to look where many are afraid to go. Because he isn’t beholden to either party, he’s a loose cannon, more than willing to impale either party or any ideology in the pursuance of that which is true, good or bad.
I agree with them ,this is a dangerous man…………….and I for one thank God for him and others like him.
Second, and I feel somewhat chagrined in admitting that I, cynic that I am, missed this. It is becoming more and more transparent that the current resident of the White House and his political cabal or coven if you like is not going to be content with governing the only superpower left in the world. They seem to have a more ambitious goal in mind.
and most frighteningly here
I’m not sure how I missed this. Mayhaps it was the Czar masquerade, the Acorn burlesque and/or the Health Care obfuscation? Slight of hand has always been a liberal talent. From trotting out the bimbos under Clinton, encouraging the Billy brigade under Carter, to the Kennedy family antics under both Kennedy and Johnson (and beyond), all of these diversion were used if not designed to take the publics attention away from what was really going on. With their co-conspirators in the media (not as many in the past as are now but….) and academia they have managed over the years to get events passed the “great unwashed masses” that might have gotten the perpetrators permanently barred from even the job of dogcatcher on Gitmo.
These people want to rule the world. They are positioning themselves as being all things to all people. Christian/ Muslim/Agnostic/ Athiests, middle of the roaders, who are only interesting in “helping” the poor, of whom surprise, surprise there is a majority. All of this at the expense of the rich, who in their world view are all those who actually work for a living, are barely making ends meet and want them to stay the heck away from them, their families, their homes, guns and their God. While the actually rich continue to fund and reap the benefits of the “New World Order”. Can you say Saudi’s, Kuwaiti’s and Qatar? There are many others but these are the ones out in front at least publicly.
Why one (mayhaps like Beck) might ask would someone like, say, Bill Gates support the current administration when his personal fortune is larger than the annual budget of Russia? An administration who supposedly has painted a large bulls eye on the back of Gates, Buffet and others like them. Personally I would not be supporting someone whose goal is to redistribute my money to people whose raison d’etre is to be on the Jerry Springer show.
Kind of makes one say Hmmmmmmmmmm…………….but hey I’m a cynic, almost everything makes me say hmmmmmmm.